"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

Before reviewing the forensic evidence at the Pentagon, we should consider that there was no way those who carried out the attacks could have known ahead of time that when it was all over, they alone would be in control all of the images and/or videos of the attack. The attack happened in a highly-exposed area, during rush-hour, on a weekday morning. They had to have presumed (exactly as occurred in Manhattan, when a French documentary filmmaker working nearby heard a plane low overhead and swung his camera upward, just in time to catch the North Tower impact) someone might just record the attack as it unfolded. A single image would reveal the lie.

That dozens of cameras ring the roof of the pentagon yet the only video released were five frames from a parking garage camera with a fish-eye lens is a transparent attempt at support the claims that Flight 77 did not hit the building. Just because no footage has ever been released does not mean it never existed, only that those in control chose to hide, and mostly likely destroy it.

The idea that no large commercial aircraft hit the pentagon was right out of the gate, immediately following the attacks and based on nothing other than superficial impressions photographs. The first person to put this idea into book form, *published within months of the attacks and translated into dozens of languages, was French journalist Thierry Meyssan. His books have been reprinted again and again, in different titles and languages through the intervening years, i.e. "L'effroyable imposture", "11. September. Der inszenierte Terrorismus," "La Terrible Impostura," "Le Pentagate", "O pentagate", "L'incredibile menzogna. Nessun aereo è caduto sul Pentagono," "Pentagate Hunt The Boeing," "L'incredibile menzogna", "9/11: The Big Lie" etc. Needless to say, this ridiculous claim has been very soundly debunked ten different ways by the evidence. See links to analysis below, if youre interested.

Images from the Germanwings suicide-slaughter crash. [image below] into the Alps make for an interesting comparison you dont see anything that resembles a plane, and in the alps there was no building for most of the plane to have gone inside of, as happened at the Pentagon.

9/11 No Planes claims are carefully designed to do a number of things, not least of which is to be as offensive as possible, by denying the victims even existed.

Another is the case of TWA 800, where the official story says that a missile was not involved. Yet 100 eyewitnesses all say they saw a missile hit the plane. *See the TWA 800 Documentary on YouTube. Eyewitnesses have no reason to lie. Although eyewitness accounts are considered one of the poorest forms of evidence in court, when we have a large body of mutually supportive eyewitness accounts, their evidenciary value increases exponentially. In this case, we have a catastrophic event that happened in a very crowded area and find the witness accounts are, for the most part, mutually supportive. However they are just one part of a large body of concordant evidence that proves flight 77 is indeed what hit the pentagon on 9/11.

Wayne Coste : Explanation of the Evidence at the Pentagon on 9/11 Narrated by David Chandler.

Blinked Views of the Plane at the Pentagon By David Chandler

Compilation of Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts

Honegger Hypothesis Refuted

Bringing Closure to a Manufactured Debate

The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows by Jim Hoffman

Going Beyond Speculation - David Chandler

Privacy and Cookie policy.

CIT's No Planes Nonsense Debunked in 3 Min.

Flight 77 frame analysis by Adam Taylor