CIT's No Planes Nonsense Debunked in 3 Min. [Mock trailer. Contains some graphic images]
Flight 77 frame analysis by Adam Taylor
The Pentagon 9/11 Truth & Disinformation
"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments" - Friedrich Nietzsche
Before reviewing the forensic evidence at the Pentagon, we should consider that there was no way those who carried out the attacks could have known ahead of time that when it was all over, they alone would be in control all of the images and/or videos of the attack. The attack happened in a highly-exposed area, during rush-hour, on a weekday morning. They had to have presumed (exactly as occurred in Manhattan, when a French documentary filmmaker working nearby heard a plane low overhead and swung his camera upward, just in time to catch the North Tower impact) someone might just record the attack as it unfolded. A single image would reveal the lie.
That dozens of cameras ring the roof of the pentagon yet the only video released were five frames from a parking garage camera with a fish-eye lens is a transparent attempt at support the claims that Flight 77 did not hit the building. Just because footage of the pentagon impact has never been released does not mean it never existed but only that those in control chose to not release it and, mostly likely, destroyed it in the same way the evidence in Manhattan was destroyed by scrubbing ground zero without a proper investigation, and shipping the structural steel [220 tons of it] overseas to India and China for recycling.
The idea that no large commercial aircraft hit the pentagon was right out of the gate, immediately following the attacks and based on nothing other than the deceptive use of photographs. The first person to put this idea into book form [published within months of the attacks and translated into dozens of languages] was French journalist Thierry Meyssan. His books making this claim have been reprinted again and again using different titles and for subsequent editions throughout the years that followed, i.e. "L'effroyable imposture", "11. September. Der inszenierte Terrorismus," "La Terrible Impostura," "Le Pentagate", "O pentagate", "L'incredibile menzogna. Nessun aereo è caduto sul Pentagono," "Pentagate Hunt The Boeing," "L'incredibile menzogna", "9/11: The Big Lie" etc.
9/11 No Planes claims are carefully designed to do a number of things, not least of which is to be as offensive as possible, by denying the victims even existed.
Another is the case of TWA 800, where the official story says that a missile was not involved. Yet 100 eyewitnesses all say they saw a missile hit the plane. *See the TWA 800 Documentary on YouTube. Eyewitnesses have no reason to lie. Although eyewitness accounts are one of the poorest forms of evidence in court, when we have a large body of mutually supportive eyewitness accounts, their value as evidence greatly increases. In this case we have a catastrophic event in a very crowded area and with a large body of concordant eyewitness accounts. They make up one aspect of a much larger body of evidence showing that flight 77 is what hit the pentagon on 9/11 and all claims that it did not are rooted in an attempt to undermine 911 Truth.
Disinformation today is a finely-honed craft that exploits our knowledge of the way memory functions. Through the use of memes, i.e. particular keywords and associations that serve as triggers to conditioned mental/emotional response, ideas are spread, like a virus, from person to person through society, spreading that idea.
Today we have Sandy Hook 'truthers', Flat Earth 'conspiracy truthers, 'crisis actors' 'pizzagate', Moloch worshipers who want to enslave the planet, etc. Nonsense as a weapon is nothing new. What is particularly insidious about the claim that no plane hit the pentagon is that it works in tandem with the claim that no planes hit the towers, -that they were "CGI on TV only", a much more patently absurd claim. In this way, it hijacks the more plausible claim (based purely on a superficial review of the evidence) that Flight 77 did not hit the pentagon, of which no footage was ever released and no large plane debris remained, and associates the two using the same 'no plane/911 truth' meme in the minds of people who are already predisposed to not want to face the implications of 911, giving them the excuse they are looking for to dismiss it all as loony conspiracism.
Wayne Coste : Explanation of the Evidence at the Pentagon on 9/11 Narrated by David Chandler.
Compilation of Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts
Honegger Hypothesis Refuted
Bringing Closure to a Manufactured Debate
The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows by Jim Hoffman
Going Beyond Speculation - David Chandler